Campaign Blog
Huffman: Policy is Taking a Backseat to Politics
Saturday, 04 September 2010 08:28

FrumForum

Friday morning David Frum interviewed the Republican Senatorial candidate in Oregon, Jim Huffman, about his thoughts on policies that would accelerate the economic recovery, health care reform, tort law, and Huffman’s vision for bipartisanship in the U.S. Senate.

Huffman started by asserting that regulatory uncertainty was a main driver for business timidity:

There are such high levels of uncertainty resulting from the regulatory regimes that have been put into place, or are being anticipated by a lot of businesses. And, I think the tax rates, particularly here in Oregon, where we’ve had a high increase in state taxes recently, I think all of that has combined to worsen the employment situation

The key, then, Huffman said, was to create a business environment that includes such things as “regulatory certainty, reasonable taxes, predictable taxes, and a climate in which people have some reasonable expectation that they’re going to get a return on their investment.”

Perhaps most important to Huffman was his focus on bringing down regulatory barriers. “I think we need to turn our focus significantly to regulatory reform – there’s only so much we can do through the tax system,” said Huffman, who pointed out that the health care bill’s regulatory burdens would be especially disastrous.

Frum pointed out that regulatory changes tend to take a long time, and asked Huffman what policy he would offer to address the currently unemployed.

Huffman agreed with Frum, saying that payroll tax holidays were a viable option, but emphasized the need to listen to business owners. “If we can assess what it is that a small business needs to have – and I think that’s short term regulatory certainty, and short term tax relief – then I think we’ll get some response in terms of investment and job creation,” he said.

In terms of Obamacare, Huffman said that defunding the program “would be one positive step in the sense that it would make it impossible for some of this stuff to be put into place.” Huffman told Frum that the health care problem that most urgently requires attention is the high cost of care, rather than universal coverage.

Frum and Huffman also discussed the idea of selling insurance across state lines, and whether interstate competition would significantly decrease health care costs; as well, they talked about the increasing restrictions on BMOs.

When Frum brought up the idea that stronger insurance companies could hold down medical costs by imposing strict price discipline on health care providers, Huffman agreed:

I think that’s a big piece of it, yes. It seems to me that the argument for interstate insurance is only part of a much broader argument about getting more competition into the health care industry.

Drawing on his legal background – Huffman is a former dean at Lewis and Clark Law School – he said that one of his priorities as a U.S. Senator would be to refer constantly to the constitution:

One thing I would do as a member of the United States Senate is demand that we ask ourselves… ‘does the federal government have the authority to do this?’ – whether or not it is a good idea, whether a health care mandate to individuals to purchase health care is a good idea… is that something the federal government has the authority to do?

Asked what lessons he’s learned as an observer of politics over the last few decades, Huffman stressed the importance of bipartisanship:

Politics has a lot to do with the failure of government over the last couple of decades… and that’s the lack of any effort or success in working across party lines to solve problems. The last time we had real tax reform in this country was 1987, and that was a real bipartisan effort…

The driving force is party discipline, is party success, is reelection of members of the party – and we’re not getting into solutions to the problems that we face in this country… what we need is the kind of bipartisan legislation that we had going back to the civil rights era, the early environmental law era.

“The central thing that I would like to do is to bring more policy expertise [to the Senate]… I think when politics drives everything and policy analysis does not, we get what we deserve,” Huffman concluded.

You can read the full article on the FrumForum here.

 
Jim Huffman Responds to Ron Wyden's Blatant Election Year Posturing
Friday, 03 September 2010 12:11

"Oregonians need a senator who stands up for them all the time, not just in the months before an election"

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 3, 2010

PORTLAND– Republican U.S. Senate Candidate Jim Huffman made the following statement in response to Sen. Ron Wyden's letter to Oregon Health Authority director Bruce Goldberg. Wyden is now encouraging the state to seek a waiver from certain ObamaCare rules.

“Ron Wyden claims that he stands up for Oregon, but when he was the deciding vote on the Obamacare legislation he was standing up for his party – not for Oregonians. Now Ron Wyden is trying to backtrack by offering a carve-out for Oregon that would not be effective until 2017 – long after the legislation is already in effect. It’s easy to see that Ron Wyden is posturing during an election year, trying to cover up for 30 years of ineffectiveness in the U.S. Congress. Oregonians need a senator who stands up for them all the time, not just in the months before an election.”

Contact: John Vinson

(503) 597-8725

Jim Huffman is Oregon’s Republican nominee for U.S. Senate. He has taught constitutional law at Lewis & Clark Law School where he also served as dean for 13 years. Huffman lives in SW Portland with his wife, Leslie, and their 3 school-aged children.

###

 
Jim Huffman on the Hugh Hewitt Show
Friday, 03 September 2010 00:00
 
Oregon Draws Short Straw
Thursday, 02 September 2010 00:00

Oregonians Watch as Their Tax Dollars Flow Into Other States

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 2, 2010

PORTLAND – The Census Bureau report on fiscal year 2009 federal spending reveals that Oregon was all but forgotten during the last year’s record spending spree.

“It is insulting to Oregonians that Ron Wyden keeps voting for deficit spending despite knowing that twice as much money is going back to Hawaii, Virginia and Alaska than is coming home to Oregon,” Huffman said of the report.

Oregon ranked the fifth lowest beneficiary of per capita spending among all states.  In a year that saw the federal government increase domestic spending by 16%, to $3.2 trillion, Oregon was largely left out.

Oregonians are being forced to shoulder the burden of this crushing debt without receiving much in return. While battling severe unemployment and a crippled economy, every Oregonian’s share of the current national debt is more than $43,000.

Huffman was to the point, stating that, “Despite 30 years of posturing and tough talk, Ron Wyden has been either unable or unwilling to stand up for Oregon when we need it the most.”

Jim Huffman is Oregon’s Republican nominee for U.S. Senate. He has taught constitutional law at Lewis & Clark Law School where he also served as dean for 13 years. Huffman lives in SW Portland with his wife, Leslie, and their 3 school-aged children.

###

 
Jim Huffman on the Mark and Dave Show
Wednesday, 01 September 2010 17:55


Click on the Play button above to listen to the full interview.
 
Jim Huffman on The Jayne Carroll Show
Tuesday, 31 August 2010 00:00


Click on the Play button above to listen to the full interview.
 
Jim Huffman on the Lars Larson Show
Tuesday, 31 August 2010 00:00
 
Jim Huffman on the Victoria Taft Show on KPAM 860
Tuesday, 31 August 2010 00:00


Click on the Play button above to listen to the full interview.
 
Video of Steve Forbes Endorsing Jim Huffman for U.S. Senate
Monday, 30 August 2010 00:00



 
Reckless Spending & Overregulation Are Crippling Our Economy
Sunday, 29 August 2010 10:54

For contrasting views on how to restore the economy, check out two commentaries in last Thursday’s New York Times.  Paul Krugman makes his usual argument for more and more stimulus spending.  This is the view embraced by Ron Wyden, President Obama and the Congressional leadership.  David Brooks, by contrast, points out that Germany took a much more modest approach to stimulating its economy.  Which approach worked better?

The President and Congressional leadership insist that the big spending approach has worked despite high unemployment and few signs of economic recovery.  Basically their argument is that things would be worse but for the spending spree.

Brooks, however, points out that the German economy is growing at a 9% annual rate.  As Brooks observes, “the results do underline one essential truth: Stimulus size is not the key factor in determining how quickly a country emerges from recession.”  What does matter, says Brooks, is instilling “good values” and creating “a secure climate.”

Brook’s latter point is the most important.  In my travels around Oregon, no theme emerges more often than the problem of government induced uncertainty.  So long as the federal government continues to spend without restraint and threatens endless regulation of the economy, there will be no economic recovery.  It would be good if folks in Washington paid a little attention to the empirical evidence like that reported on by David Brooks.

Follow on Twitter @Huffman2010

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 8
Learn more about us debt.

Syndicate

feed-image Feed Entries